"Political Correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional,
illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream
media which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to
pick up a turd by the clean end."

 

 Politically  Incorrect

Can't even trust the internet sites which are supposed "weed out" the lies, rhetoric and gossip.

Pull up the Supreme Courts website, go to the docket and search for Obama. She was the Solicitor General for all the suits against him filed with the Supreme Court to show proof of natural born citizenship. He owed her big time. All of the requests were denied of course. They were never heard. It just keeps getting deeper and deeper, doesn't it?

The American people mean nothing any longer.. It's all about payback time for those that compromised themselves to elect someone that really has no true right to even be there.

We should be getting so sick of all of this nonsense.
Here are some website's of the Supreme Court Docket:
You can look up some of these hearings and guess what?? Elana Kagan is the attorney representing Obama!!! Check out these examples:

Just Click on the URL:
http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-8857.htm
http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=%2Fdocketfiles%2F09-6790.htm
http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-724.htm

Supreme Court of the United States HOME PAGE

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=%2Fdocketfiles%2F09
 

PREAMBLE  TO THE UNITED STATES DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit* of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Declaration_of_Independence

• Webster's Definition of Pursuit:

BOTH POLITICIANS AND DIAPERS NEED TO BE CHANGED   OFTEN AND FOR THE SAMEREASON!

The changes since our days in the military are horrifying to most of us.  This politically correct CRAP has got to stop before we are living in a 1933 Germany again.  Children getting expelled from school for wearing a American flag tee shirt, because ILLEGAL ALIENS were disturbed with them. Our illustrious leader NOT wearing a flag pin and knocking the country that many loyal American Gi's died for, unlike his less than truthful self.  Come on America "WAKE UP" before it is too late!!

Here's a thought how many of our Washington Spin Masters have actually read the U.S. Constitution that they continue to violate on a daily basis?

The liberals and mainstream media have done their best to down play all that things that are considered to be problems or are distasteful so we offer the following course in "New English". The whole idea being to "down play" or disguise bad things.  However they are very REAL things.   In an effort to keep our age group  informed and able to understand the liberal politicians and mass media we offer  the following course in "The New English".(Scroll down) keep scrolling for more "Politically Incorrect Good Stuff"

Back to Top of Page

Scroll down for: Bullshit Bingo Rules

 Rules for Bullshit Bingo:

1. Before Barrack Obama's next televised speech, print your "Bullshit Bingo" Card

2. Check off the appropriate block when you hear one of those words/phrases.

3. When you get five blocks horizontally, vertically, or diagonally, stand up and shout "BULLSHIT!"

OR

Shout out “PELOSI” (it means the same thing)

DO NOT SHOP AT TARGET STORES

Sincerely,
Dick Forrey
Veterans Helping Veterans

Back to Top of Page

Illegal  Immigration

Back to Top of Page

E Pluribus Unum” - A Response to President Calderon

By Jon Huey, on May 20, 2010

Rep. Tom McClintock gave this speech in response to President Calderon's lecture to Congress. Given in the House Chamber, Washington, D.C.  May 20, 2010.  

M. Speaker:

I rise to take strong exception to the speech of the President of Mexico while in this chamber today. 

The Mexican government has made it very clear for many years that it holds American sovereignty in contempt and President Calderon’s behavior as a guest of the Congress confirms and underscores this attitude. 

It is highly inappropriate for the President of Mexico to lecture Americans on American immigration policy, just as it would be for Americans to lecture Mexico on its laws.  

It is obvious that President Calderon does not understand the nature of America or the purpose of our immigration law.  

Unlike Mexico’s immigration law -- which is brutally exclusionary -- the purpose of America’s law is not to keep people out.   It is to assure that as people come to the United States, they do so with the intention of becoming Americans and of raising their children as Americans.  

Unlike Mexico, our nation embraces immigration and what makes that possible is assimilation.

A century ago President Teddy Roosevelt put it this way.  He said:

"In the first place, we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here in good faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or birthplace, or origin. But this is predicated upon the person's becoming in every facet an American, and nothing but an American...There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn't an American at all. We have room for but one flag, the American flag... We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language ... and we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people." 

That is how we have built one great nation from the people of all the nations of the world.

The largest group of immigrants now comes from Mexico.  A recent RAND study discovered that during most of the 20th Century, while our immigration laws were actually enforced, assimilation worked and made possible the swift attainment of the American dream for millions of immigrants seeking to escape conditions in Mexico. 

That is the broader meaning of our nation’s motto, “E Pluribus Unum” – from many people, one people, the American people. 

But there is now an element in our political structure that seeks to undermine that concept of “E Pluribus Unum.”  It seeks to hyphenate Americans, to develop linguistic divisions, to assign rights and preferences based on race and ethnicity, and to elevate devotion to foreign ideologies and traditions, while at the same time denigrating American culture, American values and American founding principles. 

In order to do so, they know that they have to stop the process of assimilation.  In order to do that, they must undermine our immigration laws.  

It is an outrage that a foreign head of state would appear in this chamber and actively seek to do so.  And it is a disgrace that he would be cheered on from the left wing of the White House and by many Democrats in this Congress. 

Arizona has not adopted a new immigration law.  All it has done is to enforce existing law that President Obama refuses to enforce.  It is hardly a radical policy to suggest that if an officer on a routine traffic stop encounters a driver with no driver’s license, no passport, and who doesn’t speak English, that maybe that individual might be here illegally. 

And to those who say we must reform our immigration laws – I reply that we don’t need to reform them – we need to enforce them.  Just as every other government does.  Just as Mexico does.

Above all, this is a debate of, by and for the American people.  If President Calderon wishes to participate in that debate, I invite him to obey our immigration laws, apply for citizenship, do what 600,000 LEGAL immigrants to our nation are doing right now, learn our history and our customs, and become an American.  And then he will have every right to participate in that debate.  

Until then, I would politely invite him to have the courtesy while a guest of this Congress to abide by the fundamental rules of diplomacy between civilized nations not to meddle in each other’s domestic debates.

Link to Rep. Tom McClintock's site

"The Gun Is Civilization"

Interesting take and one you don't hear much. . . . . .

As the Supreme Court hears arguments for and against the Chicago, IL Gun Ban, I offer you another stellar example of a letter (written by a Marine) that places the proper perspective on what a gun means to a civilized society.

Read this eloquent and profound letter and pay close attention to the last paragraph of the letter...

The Gun is Civilization
by Maj. L. Caudill USMC (Ret)

Human beings only have two ways to deal with one another: reason and force. If you want me to do something for you, you have a choice of either convincing me via argument, or force me to do your bidding under threat of force. Every human interaction falls into one of those two categories, without exception. Reason or force, that's it.

In a truly moral and civilized society, people exclusively interact through persuasion. Force has no place as a valid method of social interaction, and the only thing that removes force from the menu is the personal firearm, as paradoxical as it may sound to some.

When I carry a gun, you cannot deal with me by force. You have to use reason and try to persuade me, because I have a way to negate your threat or employment of force.

The gun is the only personal weapon that puts a 100-pound woman on equal footing with a 220-pound mugger, a 75-year old retiree on equal footing with a 19-year old gang banger, and a single guy on equal footing with a carload of drunk guys with baseball bats. The gun removes the disparity in physical strength, size, or numbers between a potential attacker and a defender.

There are plenty of people who consider the gun as the source of bad force equations. These are the people who think that we'd be more civilized if all guns were removed from society, because a firearm makes it easier for a [armed] mugger to do his job. That, of course, is only true if the mugger's potential victims are mostly disarmed either by choice or by legislative fiat--it has no validity when most of a mugger's potential marks are armed.

People who argue for the banning of arms ask for automatic rule by the young, the strong, and the many, and that's the exact opposite of a civilized society. A mugger, even an armed one, can only make a successful living in a society where the state has granted him a force monopoly.

Then there's the argument that the gun makes confrontations lethal that otherwise would only result in injury. This argument is fallacious in several ways. Without guns involved, confrontations are won by the physically superior party inflicting overwhelming injury on the loser.
People who think that fists, bats, sticks, or stones don't constitute lethal force watch too much TV, where people take beatings and come out of it with a bloody lip at worst. The fact that the gun makes lethal force easier works solely in favor of the weaker defender, not the stronger attacker. If both are armed, the field is level.

The gun is the only weapon that's as lethal in the hands of an octogenarian as it is in the hands of a weight lifter. It simply wouldn't work as well as a force equalizer if it wasn't both lethal and easily employable.

When I carry a gun, I don't do so because I am looking for a fight, but because I'm looking to be left alone. The gun at my side means that I cannot be forced, only persuaded. I don't carry it because I'm afraid, but because it enables me to be unafraid. It doesn't limit the actions of those who would interact with me through reason, only the actions of those who would do so by force. It removes force from the equation... and that's why carrying a gun is a civilized act.

By Maj. L. Caudill USMC (Ret)

So the greatest civilization is one where all citizens are equally armed and can only be persuaded, never forced.

Back to Top of Page

HEALTH SCARE

AS TIME GOES ON, "THE REST OF THE STORY" ISN'T GOING TO BE PRETTY. UNDER THE NEW HEALTHSCARE BILL - ('scuse me...Law) ALL REAL ESTATE TRANSACTIONS ARE SUBJECT TO A 3.8% "SALES TAX"? WHAT DOES THAT HAVE TO DO WITH HEALTH CARE? NOTHING... NEITHER DOES MOST OF THAT BILL AS SO MANY OF US HAVE SAID SINCE DAY ONE; AT LEAST THOSE OF US WHO READ IT. PLEASE THANK NANCY, HARRY & O (AND YOUR LOCAL CONGRESSMAN) FOR THIS ONE. IF YOU SELL YOUR $400,000 DOLLAR HOME, YOUR TAX WILL BE $15,200 DOLLARS. SEE MORE IN THE FOLLOWING ARTICLE FROM THE LIBERAL SPOKANE, WA SPOKESMAN-REVIEW NEWS...AND, OH YES! "HAVE A NICE DAY!"

Back to Top of Page

WE are losing the country at a rapid pace.
HB 1388 PASSED !!

You just spent $20,000,000 to move members/supporters of Hamas, a terrorist organization, to the United States ; They get housing, food, the whole enchilada.

HB..1388…PASSED
Whether you are an Obama fan, or not, EVERYONE IN THE  U. S. Needs to know.....

Something happened.... H.R. 1388 was passed, behind our backs. You may want to read about it.. It wasn't mentioned on the news... Just went by on the ticker tape at the bottom of the CNN Screen.

Obama funds $20M in tax payer dollars to immigrate Hamas Refugees to the USA . This is the news that didn't  make the headlines... By executive order, President Barack Obama has ordered the expenditure of $20.3 million in "migration assistance" to the Palestinian refugees and "conflict victims" in Gaza . 

The "presidential determination", which allows hundreds of thousands of Palestinians with ties to Hamas to resettle in the United States , was signed and appears in the Federal Register.

Few on Capitol Hill, or in the media, took note that the order provides a free ticket replete with housing and food allowances to individuals who have displayed their overwhelming support to the Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas) in the parliamentary election of January 2006.

Let's review....itemized list of some of Barack Obama ' s most recent actions since his inauguration:

His first call to any head of state, as president, was to Mahmoud Abbas, leader of Fatah party in the Palestinian territory.

His first one-on-one television interview with any news organization was with Al Arabia television.

HisHis first executive order was to fund/facilitate abortion(s) not just here within the U. S. , but within the

world, using U. S. Tax payer funds.

He ordered Guantanamo Bay closed and all military trials of detainees halted.

He ordered overseas CIA interrogation centers closed.

He withdrew all charges against the masterminds behind the USS Cole and the "terror attack" on 9/11.

Now we learn that he is allowing hundreds of thousands of Palestinian refuges to move to, and live in, the US at American taxpayer expense

These important, and insightful, issues are being "lost" in the blinding bail-outs and "stimulation" packages.

Doubtful? To verify this for yourself: www.thefederalregister.com/d.p/2009-02-04-E9-2488

WE are losing this country at a rapid pace.   HB 1388 PASSED !!

REMEMBER THIS WHEN NOVEMBER ROLLS AROUND !

If you don't start talking this up with all your friends you're just part of the problem of national apathy.
 

2011 W-2 Tax Forms and Obamacare
   
If this doesn't get to you, then check your pulse. You may be a flat line already...
   
Should you want to verify this, go to http://www.thomas.gov/, enter "HR 3590" in the search box and look for "CRS Summaries."  This is what you'll find.
 
Title IX Revenue Provisions—Subtitle A:  Revenue Offset "(Sec. 9002) Requires employers to include in the W-2 form of each employee the aggregate cost of applicable employer-sponsored group health coverage that is excludable from the employee's gross income (excluding the value of contributions to flexible spending arrangements)."
   
 Starting in 2011—next year—the W-2 tax form sent by your employer will be increased to show the value of whatever health insurance you are provided. It doesn't matter if you're retired. Your gross income WILL go up by the amount of insurance your employer paid for. So you’ll be required to pay taxes on a larger sum of money that you actually received. Take the tax form you just finished for 2009 and see what $15,000.00 or $20,000.00 additional gross income does to your tax debt. That's what you'll pay next year. For many it puts you into a much higher bracket. This is how the government is going to buy insurance for fifteen (15) percent that don't have insurance and it's only part of the tax increases, the folks in Washington don't consider it a "tax increase" as such, it's only a "redefinition of your taxable income".
 
Also, go to Kiplinger's and read about the thirteen (13) tax changes for 2010 that could affect you.

We've been duped. I hope you tell all your friends and relatives . People have the right to know the truth because
an election is coming in November this year and the Primary Elections are happening NOW.

So VOTE.... and VOTE intelligently, based on your values. It matters more than ever! But prepare to adjust your tax withholding, or increase your savings, so that you aren't surprised and put in a jam when your federal income taxes are due on April 15, 2012.

Fight organized crime! Re-elect no one in 2010.
 

If you're not sure what "big government" implies, take a look at this . . ..

But you have already read about this in your local newspaper
Oh no, you didn't? OK then, you saw it on; CNN... No?... INTERESTING!!!

You and I may never see health care again the way it used to be, but "Emperor Obama";took six
(6) doctors with him for a 3 day visit to; London - along with 494 other essential staff.

You just gotta love this spread-the-wealth, hopey-changey thing
Can we say "narcissist" fast three or five or a; dozen times?

Feb 81 Mar 82 S2/S3 (Intelligence/Operations), United Nations Command Support Group Joint Security Area, Korea

A recent "Investor's Business Daily" article provided very interesting statistics from a survey by the United Nations International Health Organization.

            Percentage of men and women who survived a cancer five years after diagnosis:
 U.S. 65%          England 46%     Canada  42%
            Percentage of patients diagnosed with diabetes who received treatment within six months:
 U.S. 93%          England 15%     Canada  43%
            Percentage of seniors needing hip replacement who received it within six months:
 U.S. 90%          England 15%     Canada  43%
            Percentage referred to a medical specialist who see one within one month:
 U.S. 77%          England 40%     Canada  43%
            Number of MRI scanners (a prime diagnostic tool) per million people:
 U.S. 71             England 14          Canada 18%
            Percentage of seniors (65+), with low income, who say they are in excellent health":
 U.S. 12%         England 2%        Canada  6%
               
I don't know about you, but I don't want "Universal Healthcare" comparable to England or Canada.
Moreover, it was Sen. Harry Reid who said, "Elderly Americans must learn to accept the inconveniences of old age. 
"SHIP HIM TO CANADA OR ENGLAND !
He is "elderly" himself but be sure to remember his health insurance is different from yours as Congress has their own high- end coverage!  He will never have to learn to accept "inconveniences"!!!
AND THE WINNER IS VERY INTERESTING!
The percentage of each past president's cabinet who had worked in the private business sector prior to their appointment to the cabinet.  You know what the private business sector is... a real  life business, not a government job.  Here are the percentages.

And the winner of the Chicken Dinner is:
Obama................8% !!!

Yep!  That's right!  Only Eight Percent!!!.. the least by far of the last 19 presidents!!  And these people are trying to tell our big corporations how to run their business?  They know what's best for GM...Chrysler... Wall Street... and you and me?

How can the president of a major nation and society...the one with the most successful economic system in world history... stand and talk about business when he's never worked for one?.. or about jobs when he has never really had one??!  And neither has 92% of his senior staff and closest advisers!  They've spent most of their time in academia, government and/or non-profit  jobs....or as "community organizers" when they should have been in an employment line.

[Ed. note on the Ed. note:  this is from a former Chicago lawyer now practicing law in Tyler, TX]

[This is legit.  Ii has been checked  out  at https://www.iardc.org  Stands for Illinois Attorney Registration And Disciplinary Committee.  It's the official arm of lawyer discipline in Illinois; and they are very strict and mean as hell.  (Talk about irony!)  Even I, at the advanced age of almost 65, maintain (at the cost of approximately $600/year) my law license that I worked so hard and long to earn.]

Big surprise !!!

US President and Former Constitutional Law Lecturer Makes Up Constitutional Quotes During State Of The Union (SOTU) Address.

Consider this:

1.   President Barack Obama, former editor of the Harvard Law Review, is no longer a "lawyer".   He surrendered his license back in 2008 in order to escape charges he lied on his bar application.    

A "Voluntary Surrender" is not something where you decide Gee, a license is not really something I need anymore, is it?, and forget to renew your license.   No, a "Voluntary Surrender" is something you do when you've been accused of something, and you "voluntarily surrender" you license five seconds before the state suspends you.

2.   Michelle Obama "voluntarily surrendered" her law license in 1993.

3.   So, now we have the first black President and First Lady  who don't actually have licenses to practice law. Facts.

Source:  http://jdlong.wordpress.com/2009/05/15/pres-barack-obama-editor-of-the-Harvard-law-review-has-no-law-license/

4.   A senior lecturer is one thing...  A fully ranked law professor is another.   Barack Obama was NOT a Constitutional Law professor at the University of Chicago .

5.   The University of Chicago released a statement in March, 2008 saying Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) "served as a professor" in the law school but that is a title Obama, who taught courses there part-time, never held, a spokesman for the school confirmed in 2008.

6.   He did not hold the title of professor of law, said Marsha Ferziger Nagorsky, an Assistant Dean for Communications and Lecturer in Law at the University of Chicago School of Law.

Source: http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2008/03/sweet_obama_did_hold_the_title.html  ;

7.   The former Constitutional senior lecturer cited the US Constitution the other night during his State of the Union Address. Unfortunately, the quote he cited was from the Declaration of Independence  not the Constitution.

8.   The B-Cast posted the video: http://www.breitbart.tv/did-obama-confuse-the-constitution-with-the-declaration-of-independence/

9.   Free Republic:  In the State of the Union Address, President Obama said: "We find unity in our incredible diversity, drawing on the promise enshrined in our Constitution: the notion that we are all created equal".

10.  Um, wrong citing, wrong founding document there Champ, I mean Mr. President.   By the way, the promises are not a notion, our founders named them unalienable rights.  The document is our Declaration of Independence and it reads:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

11.  And this is the same guy who lectured the Supreme Court moments later in the same speech???

When you are a phoney it's hard to keep facts straight. 

Don’t forget. November 2 is “Take out the trash day” !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The following senators voted against making English the official language of America : (Republicans are in red )

Akaka (D-HI) - Bayh (D-IN) - Biden (D-DE) - Bingaman (D-NM) - Boxer (D-CA) - Cantwell (D-WA) - Clinton (D-NY) -  Dayton (D-MN) - Dodd (D-CT) -Domenici (R-NM)  Durbin (D-IL) - Feingold (D-WI) - Feinstein (D-CA) - Harkin (D-IA) - Inouye (D-HI) Jeffords (I-VT) - Kennedy (D-MA) - Kerry (D-MA) - Kohl (D-WI) - Lautenberg (D-NJ) Leahy (D-VT) - Levin (D-MI) - Lieberman (D-CT) - Menendez (D-NJ) - Mikulski (D-MD) Murray (D-WA) - Obama (D-IL) - Reed (D-RI) - Reid (D-NV) - Salazar (D-CO) Sarbanes (D-MD) - Schumer (D-NY) - Stabenow (D-MI) - Wyden (D-OR)  

Now, the following are the senators who voted to give illegal aliens Social Security benefits . They are grouped by home state. If a state is not listed, there was no voting representative.  

Alaska Stevens (R) - Arizona - McCain (R) - Arkansas Lincoln (D)  Pryor (D) California Boxer (D) Feinstein (D) Colorado Salazar (D) Connecticut  Dodd (D) Lieberman (D) Delaware Biden (D) Carper (D) Florida  Martinez (R) Hawaii Akaka (D) Inouye (D) Illinois Durbin (D) Obama (D) Indiana Bayh (D) Lugar (R) Iowa Harkin (D) Kansas Brownback (R) Louisiana Landrieu (D)Maryland Mikulski (D) Sarbanes (D) Massachusetts  Kennedy (D) Kerry (D) Montana Baucus (D) Nebraska  Hagel (R) Nevada Reid (D) New Jersey  Lautenberg (D) Menendez (D) New Mexico  Bingaman D) New York Clinton (D) Schumer (D) North Dakota  Dorgan (D) Ohio DeWine (R) Voinovich(R) Oregon Wyden (D) Pennsylvania Specter (D) Rhode Island  Chafee (R) Reed (D) South Carolina  Graham (R) South Dakota  Johnson (D) Vermont Jeffords (I) Leahy (D) Washington Cantwell (D) Murray (D) West Virginia  Rockefeller (D), by Not Voting Wisconsin Feingold (D) Kohl (D)

OBAMA'S  "CZARS"   I GOT TIRED, DISGUSTED, DISMAYED AT READING THIS LIST.  IF IT WEREN'T FOR GOD, THERE WOULD BE NO HOPE ! ! ! ! ! !    

Read who they are and realize what they want to do. 

  
How lucky we are that these are the people who are helping President Obama with the RUNNING of our country and the White House? 

From Investor's Business Daily editorial page

Dividing America

 
Posted 08/18/2010 06:42 PM ET

Islamofascism: Sept. 11 brought the nation together, uniting us against what we thought was a clear, common foe. Now the America-haters are dividing us, blurring the target, sapping our will to win.

Exhibit A is the debate over the Ground Zero mosque. A few years ago, there wouldn't be a debate. There wouldn't even be plans, let alone a zoning OK, for such a monstrosity. Talk about blasphemy! Building a 13-story shrine to Islam next to the ashes of an Islamic attack on America is a kick in our collective teeth. Ground Zero is sacred ground.

Yet House Speaker Nancy Pelosi sees the controversy as nothing more than a petty "zoning" issue. She wants critics — who happen to include the families of 9/11 victims and many Democrats (her Senate counterpart among them) — investigated for daring to speak out against its development.

Meantime, the old media are weighing in on the side of the Muslim group behind the distasteful project and against the 70% of Americans who oppose what they're doing. The so-called Cordoba Initiative says it's all about "peace and healing," yet it would rather see the issue fester than meet with officials seeking compromise.

The Philadelphia Inquirer says the Muslims have a First Amendment right to practice Islam anywhere they want. And we're all a bunch of "bigots" for asking them to move their prayer rugs where Islamic hijackers didn't slaughter so many in the name of Allah.

For its part, Time chides the public for being "obsessed" with an enemy who merely destroyed two skyscrapers, a wing of the Pentagon, 3,000 people and nearly the largest economy in the world.

"Nine years after 9/11, the fight over the mosque near Ground Zero shows how obsessed we remain with an enemy that may no longer exist," the magazine sermonized. It can't believe that, according to a recent Gallup poll, Americans still think terrorism is a bigger threat than health care costs and other social issues Time obviously cares more about.

In so many words, these Islamophiles are telling us "get over it." It's been nine years, GET OVER IT. Let the good and peaceful Muslims spread their faith. What's the problem? Well, the problem is that it took eight years for Muslim fanatics to finish off those skyscrapers after first attacking them in 1993. So nine years is about right. This is no time to get over the threat from radical Islam.

But the White House has. President Obama is gutting defense and cutting the Pentagon out of the war. His National Security Council has a new strategy to "scalpel," not "hammer," al-Qaida to death. They want a lighter footprint in Muslim countries. All to win hearts and minds.

Are we at war or aren't we? Our commander in chief, when pressed, insists we are. But then he also says we're no longer fighting a war on terror but an "overseas contingency operation." If we are at war, we should bring everything we've got against the enemy — not just scalpels.

This schizophrenic policy is dangerous. It plays right into our enemy's hands. The violent jihadists — as well as the cultural jihadists pressing for the mosque while secretly trying to implement Shariah law inside America — would like nothing more than to see us divided like this

If we can't all agree that building a mosque next to the gaping hole where the World Trade Center once stood (and where skeletal remains of its occupants are still, to this day, being exhumed and identified) is an atrocious idea, they win.

That makes the Ground Zero mosque a tipping point for the country's future. Far from a local zoning issue, this is war. If it goes through as planned, we have officially waved the white flag, and a crescent flag waving proudly from flagpoles will not be far behind.

“Islamic Gay Men”Greg Gutfield To Open A Gay Bar Next To Ground Zero Mosque To Cater To
by Jon Bershad | 8:23 pm, August 9th, 2010

No, this is not a joke. In fact, it is instead one of the most brilliant pieces of provocations in recent years. Greg Gutfield from Fox News’ Red Eyeannounced today via his blog that he is actively speaking to investors and plans on opening a gay bar next to the controversial mosque being built near Ground Zero in New York. To make matters worse (better?) the bar will be specifically designed to cater to homosexuals of the Islamic faith. God, this is going to be an exciting block.

Here’s Gutfield’s entire post which he will expand upon during tonight’s Red Eye:

“So, the Muslim investors championing the construction of the new mosque near Ground Zero claim it’s all about strengthening the relationship between the Muslim and non-Muslim world.

As an American, I believe they have every right to build the mosque – after all, if they buy the land and they follow the law – who can stop them?

Which is, why, in the spirit of outreach, I’ve decided to do the same thing.

I’m announcing tonight, that I am planning to build and open the first gay bar that caters not only to the west, but also Islamic gay men. To best express my sincere desire for dialogue, the bar will be situated next to the mosque Park51, in an available commercial space.

This is not a joke. I’ve already spoken to a number of investors, who have pledged their support in this bipartisan bid for understanding and tolerance.

As you know, the Muslim faith doesn’t look kindly upon homosexuality, which is why I’m building this bar. It is an effort to break down barriers and reduce deadly homophobia in the Islamic world.

The goal, however, is not simply to open a typical gay bar, but one friendly to men of Islamic faith. An entire floor, for example, will feature non-alcoholic drinks, since booze is forbidden by the faith. The bar will be open all day and night, to accommodate men who would rather keep their sexuality under wraps – but still want to dance.

Bottom line: I hope that the mosque owners will be as open to the bar, as I am to the new mosque. After all, the belief driving them to open up their center near Ground Zero, is no different than mine.

My place, however, will have better music.”

As soon as he figures out how to walk through that gate holding an umbrella, he'll take care of the economy, health care, Wall Street, Iraq, Afghanistan, unemployment and a few things more.  But first things first.

This is a heads up regarding  Progressive Auto Insurance.   You know who they are.   They’re the ones with the clever television ads featuring the perky  brunette actress all dressed in white.  What you might not know is  that the chairman of Progressive is Peter Lewis, one of the largest  funders of the left in America .  He’s your typical rich spoiled  kid who took over the company from his father and apparently feels  “guilty” for his success and now dedicates himself to making it  impossible for anyone else to become wealthy.  
 
Between 2001 and 2003, Lewis  funneled $15 million to the ACLU, the group most responsible for  destroying what’s left of America ’s Judeo-Christian heritage.  Indeed, Lewis is himself an ACLU member.  One of the ACLU projects  he earmarked his funds for was an effort to sue school districts who  have drug testing policies.  In other words, this idiot wants  teachers to be able to use drugs without fear of exposure.  I  wonder what he would think if all his own employees came to work drugged  out every day.  
  
Lewis also gave $12.5 million to  MoveOn.org <http://moveon.org/>  and  American Coming Together, two key components of the socialist  left.  The former group is perhaps the main group used by the Obama  forces to organize their activists; the latter group is a 527 political  action group that essentially served as a front for the SEIU union thugs  who ran ACORN.  His funding for these groups was conditional on  matching contributions from George Soros, the international  socialist who finances much  of the Obama political network.
 
It’s disturbing that Lewis made  a fortune as a result of capitalism but now finances a progressive  movement that threatens to destroy the free enterprise system.  He  reminds me somewhat of Armand Hammer, the former head of Occidental  Petroleum who did business with Joseph Stalin and become his good  friend, around the same time Stalin was executing businessmen all over  the USSR .
 
What angers me further is the  way this company is targeting television shows watched by conservatives  such as Fox News.  Peter Lewis is making a fortune off of  conservative Americans so that he can destroy our country.  He’s  banking on no one finding out who  he is.  I think it’s time we expose  this clown.     
 

The object of the game is to destroy American capitalism by having the government take over everything

Wanna Play?

No?

Too bad, you're already playing...

 FW: Muslim Heritage, My Ass! 

But if the Messiah ( zerobama 0bama) said it, it must be true... 

Barack 0BAMA, during his Cairo speech,  said:  "I know, too, that Islam has always been a part of  America story."  

AN AMERICAN CITIZEN'S RESPONSE:  

Dear Mr. 0bama:

Were those Muslims that were in America when the Pilgrims first landed?  Funny, I thought they were Native American Indians.  

Were those Muslims that celebrated the first Thanksgiving day?  Sorry again, those were Pilgrims and Native American Indians.  

Can you show me one Muslim signature on the United States Constitution?

Declaration of Independence ?

Bill of Rights?  

Didn't think so.

Did Muslims fight for this country's freedom from England ?  No.

Did Muslims fight during the Civil War to free the slaves in America ?  No, they did not.  In fact, Muslims to his day are still the largest traffickers in human slavery.  Your own half brother, a devout Muslim, still advocates slavery himself, even though Muslims of Arabic descent refer to black Muslims as "pug nosed slaves."  Says a lot of what the Muslim world really thinks of your family's "rich Islamic heritage," doesn't it Mr 0bama?  

Where were Muslims during the Civil Rights era of this country?  Not present. 

There are no pictures or media accounts of Muslims walking side by side with Martin Luther King, Jr. or helping to advance the cause of Civil Rights.  

Where were Muslims during this country's Woman's Suffrage era?  Again, not present.  In fact, devout Muslims demand that women are subservient to men in the Islamic culture.  So much so, that often they are beaten for not wearing the 'hajib' or for talking to a man who is not a direct family member or their husband.  

Yep, the Muslims are all for women's rights, aren't they? 

Where were Muslims during World War II?  They were aligned with Adolf Hitler.  The Muslim grand mufti himself met with Adolf Hitler, reviewed the troops and accepted support from the Nazi's in killing Jews. 

Finally, Mr. 0bama, where were Muslims on Sept. 11th, 2001?  If they weren't flying planes into the World Trade Center , the Pentagon or a field in Pennsylvania killing nearly 3,000 people on our own soil, they were rejoicing in the Middle East .  No one can dispute the pictures shown from all parts of the Muslim world celebrating on CNN, Fox News, MSNBC and other cable news networks that day.  Strangely, the very "moderate" Muslims who's asses you bent over backwards to kiss in Cairo , Egypt on June 4th were stone cold silent post 9-11.  To many Americans, their silence has meant approval for the acts of that day.  

And THAT, Mr. 0bama, is the "rich heritage" Muslims have here in America .. 

Oh, I'm sorry, I forgot to mention the Barbary Pirates. They were Muslim.  

And now we can add November 5, 2009 - the slaughter of American soldiers at Fort Hood by a Muslim major who is a doctor and a psychiatrist who was supposed to be counseling soldiers returning from battle in

Iraq and Afghanistan ..  

That, Mr. 0bama is the "Muslim heritage" in America  

Muslim heritage, my ass. 

0 (Pronounced ZERO bama) bama brown shirts and gangsters are at it again !!!

There are news articles at the bottom to click on the links and read further.  If this is true it just shows how government is taking over again.

Chrysler--A Very Dirty Story    Sooner or later it will all come to light!

This could be a scandal of epic proportions and one that makes Nixon's Watergate or Clinton 's Monica Lewinsky affair pale by comparison.  Why was there neither rhyme nor reason as to which dealerships of the Chrysler Corporation were to be closed? 

Roll the clock back to the weeks just before Chrysler declared bankruptcy.  Chrysler, like GM, was in dire financial straits and federal government "graciously" offered to "buy the company" and keep them out of bankruptcy and "save jobs."  Chrysler was, in the words of Obama and his administration, "Too big to fail," same story with GM.  The feds organized their "Automotive Task Force" to fix Chrysler and GM.  Obama, in an act that is 100% unconstitutional, appointed a guy named Steve Rattner to be the White House's official Car Czar - literally, that's what his title is.  Rattner is the liaison between Obama, Chrysler, and GM. Initially, the national media reported that Chrysler 'had made this list of dealerships'. Not true! 

The Washington Examiner, Newsmax, Fox News and a host of other news agencies discovered that the list of dealerships was put together by the "Automotive Task Force" headed by no one other than Mr. Steve Rattner. Now the plot thickens. Remember earlier we said that there was neither rhyme nor reason why certain dealerships were closed? Actually there's a very interesting pattern as to who was closed down.

Again, on May 27, 2009, The Washington Examiner and Newsmax exposed the connection. 

Amazingly, of the 789 dealerships closed by the federal government, 788 had donated money, exclusively to Republican political causes, while contributing nothing to Democratic political causes. The only "Democratic" dealership on the list was found to have donated $7,700 to Hillary's campaign, and a bit over $2,000 to John Edwards. This same dealership, reportedly, also gave $200.00 to Obama's campaign. Does that seem a little odd to you? 

Steve Rattner is the guy who put the list together. Well, he happens to be married to a Maureen White. Maureen happens to be the former national finance chairman of the Democratic National Committee. As such, she has access to campaign donation records from everyone in the nation- Republican or Democrat. But of course, this is just a wacky "coincidence," we're certain. Then comes another really wacky "coincidence." On that list of dealerships being closed down, a weird thing happened in Arkansas , North Louisiana, and Southern Missouri .. It seems that Bill Clinton's former White House Chief of Staff, Mack McClarty, owns a chain of dealership in that region, partnered with a fellow by the name of Robert Johnson.

Johnson happens to be founder of Black Entertainment Television and was a huge Obama supporter and financier. These guys own a half dozen Chrysler stores under the company title of RLJ-McClarty-Landers. Interestingly, none of their dealerships were ordered closed - not one! While all of their competing Chrysler/Dodge and Jeep dealership were! Eight dealerships located near the dealerships owned by McClarty and Johnson were ordered shut down. Thus by pure luck, these two major Obama supporters now have virtual monopoly on Chrysler sales in their zone. Isn't that amazing? 

Go look in The Washington Examiner, the story's there, and it's in a dozen or so other web-based news organizations; this isn't being made up. Now if you thought Chrysler was owned by Fiat, you are mistaken. Under the federal court ruling, 65% of Chrysler is now owned by the federal government and the United Auto Workers union! Fiat owns 20%. The other 15% is still privately owned and presumably will be traded on the stock market. Obama smiles and says he doesn't want to run the auto industry. 

As horrifying as this is to comprehend, and being as how this used to be the United States of America , it would appear that the president has the power to destroy private businesses and eliminate upwards of 100,000 jobs just because they don't agree with his political agenda. This is Nazi Germany stuff, and it's happening right here, right now, in our back yard. There are voices in Washington demanding an explanation, but the "Automotive Task Force" has released no information to the public or to any of the senators demanding answers for what has been done. 

Keep your ear to the ground for more on this story. If you've ever wanted to make a difference about anything in your life, get on the phone to your national senator or representative in the House and demand an investigation into this. 

Benjamin Franklin had it right when he said, "All that's necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing." Car Czar No More  An amazing thing happened as this story was going to press. Obama's Car Czar, Steve Rattner, resigned on July 13 and was promptly replaced by former steel workers union boss Ron Bloom.  According to CBS News, Rattner left "to return to private life and spend time with his family." Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner said, "I hope that he takes another opportunity to bring his unique skills to government service in the future." By the way, Rattner is under investigation for a multi-million dollar pay-to-play investment bank scandal in New York .... Uh-oh! But, we're certain that had nothing to do with his resignation. And, according to several news sources out there, there are rumors he's being investigated for what could be pay-to-play scandal involving the closing of Chrysler and GM dealerships. Really? Again, that couldn't have anything to with his resignation-that's ridiculous! Like CBS said, this guy just wants to "spend more quality time with his family." 

Obama has 32 personally appointed "czars" who answer to no one but him, all of whom are acting without any Constitutional authority. But hey, we're sure they all have "unique skills,"... as Tim Geithner likes to say! 

SOOOOO. HOWS THE CHANGE WORKING FOR YOU?..Check it out at the following websites..... 

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/Furor-grows-over-partisan-car-dealer-closings-46261447.html 

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/politics/Obamas-auto-policy-All-in-the-Democratic-family-44414452.html 

This goes from beyond corruption in high places - to gross criminal actions on the part of our government! 

I hope you will spread this far and wide, and hopefully the taxpaying public will demand some of that transparency we were promised...... followed by criminal prosecution of the perpetrators! 

The following are 19 facts about the deindustrialization of America that will blow your mind....

#1 The United States has lost approximately 42,400 factories since 2001. About 75 percent of those factories employed over 500 people when they were still in operation.

#2 Dell Inc., one of America 's largest manufacturers of computers, has announced plans to dramatically expand its operations in China with an investment of over $100 billion over the next decade.

#3 Dell has announced that it will be closing its last large U.S. manufacturing facility in Winston-Salem , North Carolina in November.  Approximately  900 jobs will be lost.

#4 In 2008, 1.2 billion cell phones were sold worldwide.  So how many of them were manufactured inside the United States ?  Zero.

#5 According to a new study conducted by the Economic Policy Institute, if the U.S. trade deficit with China continues to increase at its current rate, the U.S. economy will lose over half a million jobs this year alone.

#6 As of the end of July, the U.S. trade deficit with China had risen 18 percent compared to the same time period a year ago.

#7 The United States has lost a total of about 5.5 million manufacturing jobs since October 2000.

#8 According to Tax Notes, between 1999 and 2008 employment at the foreign affiliates of U.S. parent companies increased an astounding 30 percent to 10.1 million. During that exact same time period, U.S. employment at American multinational corporations declined 8 percent to 21.1 million.

#9 In 1959, manufacturing  represented 28 percent of U.S. economic output. In 2008, it represented 11.5 percent.

#10 Ford Motor Company recently announced the closure of a factory that produces the Ford Ranger in St. Paul , Minnesota . Approximately 750 good paying middle class jobs are going to be lost because making Ford Rangers in Minnesota does not fit in with Ford's new "global" manufacturing strategy.

#11 As of the end of 2009, less than 12 million Americans worked in manufacturing.  The last time less than 12 million Americans were employed in manufacturing was in 1941.

#12 In the United States today, consumption accounts for 70 percent of GDP. Of this 70 percent, over half is spent on services.

#13 The United States has lost a whopping 32 percent of its manufacturing jobs since the year 2000.

#14 In 2001, the United States ranked fourth in the world in per capita broadband Internet use.  Today it ranks 15th.

#15  Manufacturing employment in the U.S. computer industry is actually lower in 2010 than it was in 1975.

#16 Printed circuit boards are used in tens of thousands of different products. Asia now produces 84 percent of them worldwide.

#17 The United States spends approximately $3.90 on Chinese goods for every $1 that the Chinese spend on goods from the United States .

#18 One prominent economist is projecting that the Chinese economy will be three times larger than the U.S. economy by the year 2040.

#19 The U.S. Census Bureau says that 43.6 million Americans are now living in poverty and according to them that is the highest number of poor Americans in the 51 years that records have been kept.

So how many tens of thousands more factories do we need to lose before we do something about it?

How many millions more Americans are going to become unemployed before we all admit that we have a very, very serious  problem on our hands?

How many more trillions of dollars are going to leave the country before we realize that we are losing wealth at a pace that is killing our economy?

How many once great manufacturing cities are going to become rotting war zones like Detroit before we understand that we are committing national economic suicide?

The deindustrialization of America is a national crisis.  It needs to be treated like one.

If you disagree with this article, I have a direct challenge for you.  If anyone can explain how a deindustrialized America has any kind of viable economic future, please do so below in the comments section.

America is in deep, deep trouble folks.  It is time to wake up !  So,, what can you do about it you ask ??

You can forward this email, contact your Congressmen and Senators and State legislators, only elect the ones that recognize the problem, generally just try to make everyone (that will listen) aware of the problem....

Wow!   Well  written.            SNOPES: CORRECTLY  ATTRIBUTED 

Subject:  AARP 

I  find this very interesting reading, so let's  keep it going if you agree.  It only takes  a few days on the Internet and this will have  reached 75% of the public in the U.S.A.   Seniors need to stand up for what is  right, not what the politicians want or big  Corporations want.

The  disillusionment on the Internet is becoming  increasingly repetitive - the country's backbone  is waking up.  Will they listen?  Or  do we have to embrace the radicals she  mentions?

This  was sent to Mr. Rand who is the Executive  Director of AARP.

THIS LADY NOT ONLY HAS  A GRASP OF THE SITUATION, BUT AN INCREDIBLE  COMMAND OF THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE!

Dear Mr. Rand,

Recently you sent us a letter  encouraging us to renew our lapsed membership in  AARP by the requested date.  I know it is  not what you were looking for, but this is the  most honest response I can give you.  Our  gap in coverage is merely a microscopic symptom  of the real problem, a deepening lack of  faith. 

While  we have proudly maintained our membership for  several years and have long admired the AARP  goals and principles, regrettably, we can no  longer endorse it's abdication of our values.   Your letter specifically stated that we  can count on AARP to speak up for our rights,  yet the voice we hear is not ours.  Your  offer of being kept up to date on important  issues through DIVIDED WE FAIL presents neither  an impartial view nor the one we have come to  embrace.  We do believe that when two  parties agree all the time on everything  presented to them, one is probably not  necessary.  But, when the opinions and long  term goals are diametrically opposed, the  divorce is imminent.  This is the  philosophy which spawned our 200 years of  government.

Once upon a time, we looked  forward to being part of the senior demographic.   We also looked to AARP to provide certain  benefits and give our voice a power we could not  possibly hope to achieve on our own.  AARP  gave us a sense of belonging which we no longer  enjoy.  The Socialist politics practiced by  the Obama administration and empowered by AARP  serves only to raise the blood pressure my  medical insurance strives to contain.   Clearly a conflict of interest  there!

We do not understand the AARP  posture, feel greatly betrayed by the guiding  forces that we expected to map out our senior  years and leave your ranks with a great sense of  regret.  We mitigate that disappointment  with the relief of knowing that we are not  contributing to the problem anymore by renewing  our membership.  There are numerous other  organizations which offer discounts without  threatening our way of life or offending our  sensibilities.

This Presidential  Administration scares the living daylights out  of us.  Not just for ourselves, but for our  proud and bloodstained heritage.  But even  more importantly for our children and  grandchildren.   Washington has rendered  Soylent Green a prophetic cautionary tale rather  than a nonfiction scare tactic.  I have  never in my life endorsed any militant or  radical groups, yet now I find myself listening  to them.  I don't have to agree with them  to appreciate the fear which birthed their  existence.  Their borderline insanity  presents little more than a balance to the voice  of the Socialist mindset in power.  Perhaps  I became American by a great stroke of luck in  some cosmic uterine lottery, but in my adulthood  I CHOOSE to embrace it and nurture the freedoms  it represents as well as the responsibilities it  requires.

Your website generously offers  us the opportunity to receive all communication  in Spanish.  ARE YOU KIDDING???   Someone has broken into our “house”,  invaded our home without our invitation or  consent.  The President has insisted we  keep the perpetrator in comfort and learn the  perp language so we can communicate our  reluctant welcome to them.

I DON'T choose  to welcome them.

I DON'T choose to  support them.

I DON'T choose to educate  them.

I DON'T choose to medicate them,  pay for their food or clothing.

American  home invaders get arrested.

Please  explain to me why foreign lawbreakers can enjoy  privileges on American soil that Americans do  not get?

Why do some immigrants have to  play the game to be welcomed and others only  have to break & enter to be  welcomed?

We travel for a living.   Walt hauls horses all over this great  country, averaging over 10,000 miles a month  when he is out there.  He meets more people  than a politician on caffeine overdose.  Of  all the many good folks he enjoyed on this last  10,000 miles, this trip yielded only ONE  supporter of the current administration..   One of us is out of touch with mainstream   America .  Since our poll is conducted  without funding, I have more faith in it than  one which is power driven.

We have  decided to forward this to everyone on our  mailing list, and will encourage them to do the  same.  With several hundred in my address  book, I have every faith that the eventual  exponential factor will make a credible  statement to you.

I am disappointed as  hell. 

I am  scared as hell.

I am MAD as hell, and I'm  NOT gonna take it anymore! 

Walt  & Cyndy 

Letters To Leaders

 All messages are published with permission of the sender. The general topic of this message is Gov't Operations:

 Subject:

OBAMA'S BOSS, GEORGE SOROS & WHAT HE HAS IN STORE FOR AMERICA, pt 1 

To:  Sen. Jim DeMint

 July 23, 2010 

Who Is George Soros?

For those of you who espouse the liberal agenda you should read about the man behind the scenes.  

This will wake you up! Here is what (CBS') Mr. (Steve) Kroft's research has turned up.  

"The main obstacle to a stable & just world order is the United States ." George Soros 

"George Soros is an evil man. He's anti-God, anti-family, anti-American, & anti-good." He killed & robbed his own Jewish people.  

If George Soros isn't the world's preeminent "malignant messianic narcissist," he'll do until Hitler, Stalin, Mao, and Pol Pot are reincarnated. 

Soros is a multi-billionaire atheist, with skewed moral values, & a sociopath's lack of conscience. He considers himself to be an elitist world class philosopher, despises the American Way & just loves to do social engineering (change cultures).

 Born as György Schwartz, George Soros, on August 12, 1930 in Hungary. Soros' father, Tivadar, was a fervent practitioner of the Esperanto a language invented in 1887, & designed to be the first global language, free of any national identity.

 The Schwartz's, who were non-practicing Jews, changed the family name to Soros, in order to facilitate assimilation into the gentile population, as the Nazis spread into Hungary during the 1930s.

 When Hitler's henchman Adolf Eichmann arrived in Hungary, to oversee the murder of that country's Jews, George Soros ended up with a man whose job was confiscating property from the Jewish population. Soros went with him on his rounds.

 Soros has repeatedly called 1944 "the best year of his life."

 "70% of Mr. Soros's fellow Jews in Hungary , nearly a half-million human beings, were annihilated in that year, yet he gives no sign that this put any damper on his elation, either at the time or indeed in retrospect."

 During an interview with "Sixty Minute's" Steve Kroft, Soros was asked about his "best year:"  

KROFT: My understanding is that you went out with this protector of yours who swore that you were his adopted godson.

 SOROS: Yes. 

KROFT: Went out, in fact, and helped in the confiscation of property from your fellow Jews, friends and neighbors. 

SOROS: Yes. That's right.

 KROFT: I mean, that sounds like an experience that would send lots of people to the psychiatric couch for many, many years. Was it difficult?

 SOROS: No, not at all. I rather enjoyed it.

 KROFT: No feeling of guilt?

 SOROS: No, only feelings of absolute power.

 In his article, Muravchik describes how Soros has admitted to having "carried some rather potent messianic fantasies with me from childhood, which I felt I had to control, otherwise they might get me in trouble."

 After WWII, Soros attended the London School of Economics, where he fell under the thrall of fellow atheist & Hungarian, Karl Popper, a professor. Popper was a mentor to Soros until Popper's death in 1994. Two of Popper's most influential teachings concerned "the open society," & Fallibilism.

 Fallibilism is the philosophical doctrine that all claims of knowledge could, in principle, be mistaken.

 The "open society" basically refers to a "test & evaluate" approach to social engineering. Regarding "open society" Roy Childs writes, "Since the Second World War, most of the Western democracies have followed Popper's advice about piecemeal social engineering and democratic social reform, & it has gotten them into a grand mess." 

In 1956 Soros moved to New York City, where he worked on Wall Street, and started amassing his fortune. He specialized in hedge funds & currency speculation. 

Soros is absolutely ruthless, amoral, & clever in his business dealings, & quickly made his fortune. By the 1980s he was on his way to becoming the global powerhouse that he is today. 

In an article Kyle-Anne Shiver wrote for "The American Thinker" she says, "Soros made his first billion in 1992 by shorting the British pound with leveraged billions in financial bets, & became the man who broke the Bank of England. He broke it on the backs of hard-working British citizens who immediately saw their homes severely devalued & their life savings cut drastically, almost overnight." 

In 1994 Soros crowed in "The New Republic " that "the former Soviet Empire is now called the Soros Empire." The Russia-gate scandal in 1999, which almost collapsed the Russian economy, was labeled by Rep. Jim Leach, then head of the House Banking Committee, to be "one of the greatest social robberies in human history." The "Soros Empire".

 In 1997 Soros almost destroyed the economies of Thailand & Malaysia . At the time, Malaysia 's Prime Minister, Mahathir Mohammad, called Soros "a villain, and a moron." Thai activist Wing Tojirakarn said, "We regard George Soros as a kind of Dracula. He sucks the blood from the people."

 The website Greek National Pride reports, "[Soros] was part of the full court press that dismantled Yugoslavia & caused trouble in Georgia , Ukraine & Myanmar [ Burma ]. Calling himself a philanthropist, Soros' role is to tighten the ideological stranglehold of globalization & the New World Order while promoting his own financial gain. He is without conscience; a capitalist who functions with absolute amorality."

 France has upheld an earlier conviction against Soros, for felony insider trading. Soros was fined 2.9 million dollars. 

Recently, his native Hungary fined Soros 2.2 million dollars for "illegal market manipulation." Elizabeth Crum writes that "The Hungarian economy has been in a state of transition as the country seeks to become more financially stable and westernized. [Soros'] deliberately driving down the share price of its largest bank put Hungary's economy into a wicked tailspin, one from which it is still trying to recover.  

My point here is that Soros is a planetary parasite. His grasp, greed, and gluttony have a global reach.

 But what about America ? Soros told Australia 's national newspaper "The Australian" " America, as the centre of the globalized financial markets, was sucking up the savings of the world. This is now over. The game is out," he said, adding that the time has come for "a very serious adjustment" in American's consumption habits. He implied that he was the one with the power to bring this about."

 Soros: "World financial crisis was "stimulating" & "in a way, the culmination of my life's work."

 Obama has recently promised 10 billion of our tax dollars to Brazil, in order to give them a leg-up in expanding their offshore oil fields. Obama's largesse towards Brazil, came shortly after his political financial backer, George Soros, invested heavily in Brazilian oil (Petrobras).

 Tait Trussel writes, "The Petrobras loan may be a windfall for Soros & Brazil, but it is a bad deal for the U.S. The American Petroleum Institute estimates that oil exploration in the U.S. could create 160,000 new, well-paying jobs, as well as $1.7 trillion in revenues to federal, state, & local governments, all while fostering greater energy security & independence."

 A blog to keep an eye on is SorosWatch.com. Their mission: "This blog is dedicated to all who have suffered due to the ruthless financial pursuits of George Soros. Your stories are many and varied, but the theme is the same: the destructive power of greed without conscience. We pledge to tirelessly watch Soros wherever he goes & to print the truth in the hope that he will one day be made to stop preying upon the world's poor, that justice will be served."  

Back to America. Soros has been actively working to destroy America from the inside out for some years now. People have been warning us. Two years ago news sources reported that "Soros [is] an extremist who wants open borders, a one-world foreign policy, legalized drugs, euthanasia, & on and on. This is off-the-chart dangerous." 

In 1997 Rachel Ehrenfeld wrote, "Soros uses his philanthropy to change or more accurately deconstruct the moral values and attitudes of the Western world, & particularly of the American people. His "open society" is not about freedom; it is about license. His vision rejects the notion of ordered liberty, in favor of a PROGRESSIVE ideology of rights & entitlements."

 Perhaps the most important of these "whistle blowers" are David Horowitz and Richard Poe. Their book "The Shadow Party" outlines in detail how SOROS HIJACKED THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY, & NOW OWNS IT LOCK, STOCK & BARREL.

 Soros has been packing the Democratic Party with radicals, & ousting moderate Democrats for years.  

The Shadow Party became the Shadow Government, which became the Obama Administration.

 CONTINUED IN ANOTHER MAILING......

 AMERICA STANDS AT THE BRINK OF AN ABYSS, AND THAT FACT IS DIRECLTY ATTRIBUTABLE TO SOROS. SOROS HAS VIGOROUSLY, CLEVERLY, AND INSIDIOUSLY PLANNED THE RUINATION OF AMERICAL AND HIS PUPPET, BARAK OBAMA IS LEADING THE WAY. 

THESE DEMOCRATS MUST BE VOTED OUT OF CONGRESS THIS NOVEMBER IF WE STAND A CHANCE OF GETTING OUR COUNTRY BACK. IF DEMOCRATS KEEP MAJORITY IN BOTH HOUSES; WE WILL BE UNDER THE RULE OF THEM AND A DICTATOR FOREVER. EVEN IF YOU DON'T LIKE THE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE, THEY CAN BE CONVINCED BETTER THAN THE DEMOCRATS WHO DON'T CARE WHAT WE WANT. THE PURPOSE IS TO REMOVE THE SOCIALIST RULE IN CONGRESS. PLEASE PASS THIS ON TO EVERYONE IN YOUR ADDRESS BOOK.

http://www.congress.org/congressorg/bio/userletter/?letter_id=5546331866

If you're not a senior yet, or a baby boomer nearing retirement age, then consider your parents and grandparents. We BETTER wake up and smell the coffee before it is too late to stop this insanity!!!  

Senior Death Warrant
Diagnosed with cancer last year.  See what his doctor is saying....

 Wednesday, I was at the doctor whom I have been going to since we moved down here (he is the one who discovered my cancer).  I have to get a very expensive shot every 3 months ($3000) that is designed to keep the PSA down and help to prevent a recurrence of the cancer.  Has some uncomfortable side effects, and I was questioning the need to continue with it, which he assured me was necessary.  He then asked how old I was, and when I replied 70, he said that that with the new health care legislation I probably would not be able to get it next year, as that would be money better spent on someone else with greater longevity.  I would be referred to someone to "counsel" me.

I asked him why the AMA had recently endorsed the plan.  He replied that only about 15% of the nation's doctors were members of AMA, and most of them were not really on the front lines of doctorhood but in some other areas of medicine.  He said he was a member, but would not be after this membership year.  This man got part of his training in London, and practiced in Canada for 16 years before coming to the US, and he has no use for socialized medicine, regardless of how you wrap it, or what kind of bow to put on it.  He said that we have a shortfall of around 400,000 doctors at the present time, and many of today's doctors are of the baby boomer generation who are nearing retirement and/or will decide to hang it up rather than deal with the results this is sure to bring. 

Scary, my friends.  The picture for our age group is not pretty in Obamaland. 

SENIOR DEATH WARRANTS:
In England no one over 59 can receive heart repairs or stents or bypass because it is not covered as being too expensive and not needed.  Obama wants a healthcare system just like Canada's and  England's.

Everybody that is on this mailing list is either a senior citizen, is getting close or knows somebody that is.  Most of you know that the Senate version (at least) of the "stimulus" bill includes provisions for extensive rationing of health care for senior citizens. The author of this part of the bill, former senator and tax evader, Tom Daschle was credited  by Bloomberg with the following statement:  Bloomberg: Daschle says "health-care reform will not be pain free.  Seniors should be more accepting of the conditions that come with age instead of treating them."

If this does not sufficiently raise your ire, just remember that our esteemed Senators and Congressmen have their own healthcare plan that is first dollar or very low co-pay which they are guaranteed for the remainder of their lives. Nor are they subject to this new law.  Please use the power of the Internet to get this message out.  Talk it up at the grassroots level.  We have an election coming up very shortly.  And we have the ability to address and reverse the dangerous direction the Obama administration and its allies have begun  Let's do this! 

If you disagree, do nothing.

The Great Simulation (or smoke & mirrors which is what the stimulus was)

Budgets do not come from the White House. They come from Congress, and the party that controlled Congress since January 2007 is the Democrat Party. They controlled the budget process for FY 2008 and FY 2009, as well as FY 2010 and FY 2011. In that first year, they had to contend with George Bush, which caused them to compromise on spending, when Bush somewhat belatedly got tough on spending increases.

For FY 2009 though, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid bypassed George Bush entirely, passing continuing resolutions to keep government running until Barack Obama could take office. At that time, they passed a massive omnibus spending bill to complete the FY 2009 budgets.

 And where was Barack Obama during this time? He was a member of that very Congress that passed all of these massive spending bills, and he signed the omnibus bill as President to complete FY 2009. Let's remember what the deficits looked like during that period:    (below)

If the Democrats inherited any deficit, it was the FY 2007 deficit, the last of the Republican budgets.  That deficit was the lowest in five years, and the fourth straight decline in deficit spending. After that, Democrats in Congress took control of spending, and that includes Barack Obama, who voted for the budgets. If Obama inherited anything, he inherited it from himself. 

In a nutshell, what Obama is saying is I inherited a deficit that I voted for and then I voted to expand that deficit four-fold since January 20th.

Air Force 2 only used 47,500 gallons of jet fuel for this trip and carbon emissions were a mere 1,031 tons of CO2. These are only rough estimates, but they are close. That's quite a carbon footprint as my good friend Al Gore would say, so we must ask the American citizens to drive smaller, more fuel efficient cars and drive less too, so we can lessen our combined carbon footprint. 

I know times are hard and millions of you are struggling to put food on the table and trying to make ends meet. I do appreciate your sacrifice and do hope you find work soon. I was really exhausted after Barack took our family on a luxury vacation in Maine a few weeks ago. I just had to get away for a few days. 

The great mystery..............

Ever wonder why no one ever came forward from President Obama's past saying they knew him, attended school with him, was his Friend, etc. ??  Not one person has ever come forward from his past.

VERY, VERY STRANGE..

This should really be a cause for great concern.  To those Who voted for him, you may have elected an unqualified, inexperienced shadow man. Reminds me of The Manchurian Candidate....

             Let's face it.  As insignificant as we all are .. Someone Whom we went to school with remembers our name or face ... Someone Remembers we were the clown or the dork or the brain or the quiet one or The bully or something about us.

           George Stephanopoulos of ABC News said the same thing during the 2008 campaign.  He questiones why no one has acknowledged the President was in their classroom or ate in the same cafeteria or made
Impromptu speeches on campus

           Stephanopoulos also was a classmate of Obama at Columbia -- the Class of 1984.  He says he never had a single class with him.

           While he is such a great orator, why doesn't anyone in Obama's College class remember him?  And, why won't he allow Columbia to release his records?

 NOBODY REMEMBERS OBAMA AT COLUMBIA !

         Looking for evidence of Obama's past, Fox News contacted 400 Columbia University students from the period when Obama claims to have been there, but none remembered him.

Wayne Allyn Root was, like Obama, a political science major at Columbia who also graduated in 1983. In 2008, Root says of Obama, "I  Don't know a single person at Columbia that knew him, and they all know Me. I don't have a classmate who ever knew Barack Obama at Columbia .. EVER!

Nobody recalls him.  Root adds that he was also, like Obama, "Class of  '83 political science, pre-law" and says, "You don't get more Exact or closer than that."  Never met him in my life, don't know anyone who ever met him.  At the class reunion, our 20th reunion five years ago, who was asked to be the speaker of the class?  Me.  No one ever heard of Barack! And five years ago, nobody even knew who he was.

 The guy who writes the class notes, who's kind of the, as we say In New York , the macha who knows everybody, has yet to find a person, a Human who ever met him." Obama's photograph does not appear in the school's yearbook and Obama consistently declines requests to talk about his years at Columbia, Provide school records, or provide the name of any former classmates or Friends while at Columbia… 

NOTE:  Root graduated as Valedictorian from his high school, 

Thornton-Donovan School , then graduated from Columbia University in 1983 As a Political Science major in the same class that Barack Hussein Obama As a Political Science major in the same class that Barack Hussein Obama was supposed to have been in. 

Some other interesting questions..
            Why was Obama's law license inactivated in 2002?
            Why was Michelle's law license inactivated by Court Order?
            It is circulating that according to the U.S. Census, there is only one Barack Obama but 27 Social  Security numbers and over 80 aliases..
            WHAT!!  ???   The Social Security number he uses now originated in Connecticut where he is never reported to have lived.

No wonder all his records are sealed!

               Don’t know who said it, but one of the best pieces of wisdom yet!

 "The danger to America is not Barack Obama but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the Presidency.  It will be far easier to limit and undo the follies of an Obama presidency than to restore the necessary common sense and good judgment to a depraved electorate willing to have such a man for their president. The problem is much deeper and far more serious than Mr. Obama, who is a mere symptom of what ails America.   Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince. The Republic can survive a Barack Obama, who is, after all, merely a fool.  It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools such as those who made him their president."

House Minority Leader  Lawrence F. Cafero Jr., R-Norwalk, pictured standing, far right, speaks while colleagues Rep. Barbara Lambert, D-Milford and Rep. Jack F. Hennessy, D-Bridgeport, play solitaire Monday night as the House convened to vote on a  new budget. (AP)

The guy sitting in the row in front of these two....he's on Facebook, and the guy behind Hennessy is checking out the baseball scores.

These are the folks that couldn't get the budget out by Oct. 1, and are about to control your health care, cap and trade, and the list goes on and on….  
Should we buy them larger screen computers - or - a ticket home, permanently?
 

Cameron's Multicultural Wake-Up Call

The growth of Islamist extremism in the West is something even the politically correct can no longer ignore.

Two years ago, Barack Obama was inaugurated as president of the United States .  Are you better off today than you were two years ago? Numbers don't lie, and here are the data on the impact he has had on the lives of Americans: